Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Illya Marchenko vs Greg Jones Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marchenko vs Jones analysis and find out who is favored!
Illya Marchenko vs Greg Jones Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Marchenko 3 - 0 Jones
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marchenko has won 50.35% of points on his second serve, while Jones has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marchenko, in recent form, has won 44.92% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jones has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.5% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marchenko has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jones has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marchenko has won 59.68% of matches played (W/L 37/ 25), with Jones winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84). Jones has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 14/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.75% of matches (W/L 32/ 19), where as Jones has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Marchenko winning 3 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Marchenko winning 6 and Jones winning 0. The last match between Marchenko and Jones was at the Lexington Challenger, 25-07-2013, Second, Hard with Illya Marchenko getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:49:11.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marchenko and Jones have played a deciding set 0 times, with Marchenko winning 0 times and Jones 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marchenko winning 0, and Jones 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marchenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 314.11 while Jones has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marchenko has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jones has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marchenko has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jones has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marchenko 3 - 0 Jones
242
Rank
49
High
36
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
179
High
35
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
57% (602-447)
Career Total W/L
55% (293-244)
38% (8-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,217,273
Career Prize Money
$50,600
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Greg Jones |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 0 |
| Games Won | 36 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:49:11 | 0:49:11 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (56/90) | 56% (64/114) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (47/56) | 66% (42/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (19/34) | 42% (21/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (8/20) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (51/114) | 27% (24/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Illya Marchenko
Player
Greg Jones
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Greg Jones
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
10
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Greg Jones |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (21/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (242/266) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 116 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 267.95 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (939/1662) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (659/939) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (364/723) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (47/141) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (586/1633) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
76 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
17
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
43 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
97
|
0-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Max Purcell
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Hiroki Moriya
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Illya Marchenko
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
15
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Illya Marchenko
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Greg Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Babanine
Player
Greg Jones
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
44 of
92)
6
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
8
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
38 of
44)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Greg Jones
55%
(
56 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
85 of
118)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
85)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
118)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alexander Ward
Player
Greg Jones
44%
(
26 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greg Jones
Player
Lucas Gomez
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
21
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Greg Jones
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Greg Jones
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greg Jones
Player
Nick Chappell
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Conor Berg
Player
Greg Jones
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
8
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
56 of
77)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
120)
114
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(1) 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Lamble
Player
Greg Jones
44%
(
35 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Greg Jones
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Marchenko Vs Jones Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
